Revista Umělec 2005/1 >> The Praise of Messiness or a New Constitution? Lista de todas las ediciones
The Praise of Messiness or a New Constitution?
Revista Umělec
Año 2005, 1
6,50 EUR
7 USD
Enviar la edición impresa:
Suscripción de orden

The Praise of Messiness or a New Constitution?

Revista Umělec 2005/1

01.01.2005

Denisa Kera | housing | en cs

“It is only when we spread out somehow that we can surpass ourselves...”
(from an interview of the authors of the project in the Forum magazine of architecture)



The bravest dreams of the famous philosopher Bruno Latour about a common house of people and things are embodied by the Janeček home. Whilst everyone chatters on about a multicultural society that welcomes strangers, the Janeček family takes this a step further. In this world, the greatest strangers are the objects that Latour says have been multiplying from the 16th century onward thanks to science and technology—things that make our world an increasingly complex interconnected network of hybrid forms and monsters. Latour bestows Baroque titles, like Parliament of things, new constitution and political ecology on any community that recognizes the significance of these new inhabitants of this world, and attempts to work with them.
The Janeček house is a fundamental fragment of a world where it is getting harder to distinguish nature from technology, determine where wilderness ends and civilization begins, and understand whether modern humans are not becoming cyborgs with the help of medicine and technological innovation. It is an unusual home indeed: it has an authentic cosmos, a perfect and true whole—an ecosystem in which various “housemates” co-exist in harmony. A generation of people, things, animals, and even thoughts and style are layered like a modern novel. The Janečeks have lived and continue to live what philosophers have been writing about for decades. Their house hails the end of anthropocentrism and celebrates a joyful and harmonic co-existence with all sorts of ancient and newly emerging human and “non-human” agents.
This praise of clutter carries philosophical and artistic justification to all similarly inclined people. It is actually a manifesto that should start with Nabokov’s sentence parodying Tolstoy’s idea of happy and unhappy families: “All happy families are more or less dissimilar; all unhappy families are more or less alike.” The zealous insistance on neatness and order in contemporary homes influenced by the minimalist ideals of lifestyle magazines and the IKEA cult and that never changes; the clutter of tolerant and happy families and things always varies. Next time, when someone scolds you for disorder in your apartment, you can proudly stand side by side with Latour and the Janečeks and explain that you only negotiate with things that concern the new constitution and you are cooperating with your clutter to create a new form of “experimental collectivity.”





Comentarios

Actualmente no hay comentarios

Agregar nuevo comentario

Artículos recomendados

Malvado Malvado
“La persona debe sacudir tres veces la mano de alguien mientras mantiene fijamente la mirada en sus ojos. Así es como es posible memorizar el nombre de una persona con certeza. De ésta forma es como he recordado los nombres de las 5000 personas que han estado en el Horse Hospital”, me dijo Jim Holland. Holland es un experimentado cineasta, músico y curador. En su infancia, sufrió al pasar por…
Intoxicated by Media Déjà-vu / Notes on Oliver Pietsche"s Image Strategy Intoxicated by Media Déjà-vu / Notes on Oliver Pietsche"s Image Strategy
Goff & Rosenthal gallery, Berlin, November 18 - December 30, 2006 Society permanently renegotiates the definition of drugs and our relationship towards them. In his forty-five minute found-footage film The Conquest of Happiness, produced in 2005, Oliver Pietsch, a Berlin-based video artist, demonstrates which drugs society can accommodate, which it cannot, and how the story of the drugs can be…
An unsuccessful co-production An unsuccessful co-production
If you know your way around, you might discover that every month and maybe even every week you stand the chance to receive money for your cultural project. Successful applicants have enough money, average applicants have enough to keep their mouths shut, and the unsuccessful ones are kept in check by the chance that they might get lucky in the future. One natural result has been the emergence of…
Terminator vs. Avatar: Notes on Accelerationism Terminator vs. Avatar: Notes on Accelerationism
Why political intellectuals, do you incline towards the proletariat? In commiseration for what? I realize that a proletarian would hate you, you have no hatred because you are bourgeois, privileged, smooth-skinned types, but also because you dare not say that the only important thing there is to say, that one can enjoy swallowing the shit of capital, its materials, its metal bars, its polystyrene…