Revista Umělec 2000/4 >> Tip ZCCA Lista de todas las ediciones
Tip ZCCA
Revista Umělec
Año 2000, 4
6,50 EUR
7 USD
Enviar la edición impresa:
Suscripción de orden

Tip ZCCA

Revista Umělec 2000/4

01.04.2000

info | en cs

Children inherently and fragmentarily preserve one of the archetypal reasons why it is possible to make sculptures: “I want something I like, something I would like to have.” It’s very straightforward: affection—desire—interpretation. At the same time, children-artists are characteristic for their non-sentimental, unbelievably philosophically balanced approach to it. They don’t get attached nor do they re-use things.
This summer has offered an interesting comparison with two stories reminding us of winter. London is watching huge snowballs with little things mixed in by Andy Goldsworthy slowly melt away in the sun (his website meticulously presents the project, including an offer (and prices) for photographs from his previous projects). In the meantime, in Skopje, the steamy capital of Macedonia, the photograph of a snow car slowly melts and disappears on a notice board nailed to the fence of the Karpoš house of pioneers (scouts).
M.Z., Aug. 3, 2000, Libušín




Comentarios

Actualmente no hay comentarios

Agregar nuevo comentario

Artículos recomendados

MIKROB MIKROB
There’s 130 kilos of fat, muscles, brain & raw power on the Serbian contemporary art scene, all molded together into a 175-cm tall, 44-year-old body. It’s owner is known by a countless number of different names, including Bamboo, Mexican, Groom, Big Pain in the Ass, but most of all he’s known as MICROBE!… Hero of the losers, fighter for the rights of the dispossessed, folk artist, entertainer…
No Future For Censorship No Future For Censorship
Author dreaming of a future without censorship we have never got rid of. It seems, that people don‘t care while it grows stronger again.
Contents 2016/1 Contents 2016/1
Contents of the new issue.
Nick Land – An Experiment in Inhumanism Nick Land – An Experiment in Inhumanism
Nick Land was a British philosopher but is no longer, though he is not dead. The almost neurotic fervor with which he scratched at the scars of reality has seduced more than a few promising academics onto the path of art that offends in its originality. The texts that he has left behind are reliably revolting and boring, and impel us to castrate their categorization as “mere” literature.