Revista Umělec 1999/1 >> Yan-Pei Ming Lista de todas las ediciones
Yan-Pei Ming
Revista Umělec
Año 1999, 1
2,50 EUR
3 USD
Enviar la edición impresa:
Suscripción de orden

Yan-Pei Ming

Revista Umělec 1999/1

01.01.1999

Vít Havránek | reviews | en cs

In France, painting has been for a long time experiencing insecurity. If an artist actually manages to enter the context of contemporary art, one gets a feeling that it happens so out of curatorial need to fill up the wall, or to spice up the installation-conceptual character of current exhibitions by throwing in one or two canvases (e.g. the Le Consortium exhibition at Centre Pompidou). In this for painting so critical time, out of nowhere appeared a painter who managed to get among the contemporary ones and even has big solo shows. One of his advantages include his Chinese origin bringing automatically a different optics for a French intellectual.
Indeed, Ming combines several very interesting elements. His paintings look flat and almost boring in their black-and-white reproductions but in reality they are huge (2-5 meters) boasting with wonderful energy of broad expressive handwriting.
Just as austere as his gray-black-and-white color combination (he actually painted one red cycle of Mao Zedong) are the themes he chooses, painting either enlarged human faces or landscapes. The cycle of humans, imaginary contemporary faces (or unidentified victims of accidents and crimes), reflects his fascination by the mass (those Chinese!), by an individual yet perfectly replaceable fate, a unique depth of a face and its life. His International Landscapes share a similar background - large horizons of an imaginary landscape, completely lacking traces of their typical features or inner character, repeated, absolutely uninteresting.
Ming’s paintings are in their core very pathetic and existential, surprisingly anchored in modernist tradition of abstract expressionism, Giacometti, Bacon. It is when his works are compared with them that they convince us of their strength. Ming is a peculiar phenomenon: a painter outside the issues of his time. It is paradoxical that he is highly appreciated by his peers and is significant for current situation in contrast with more contemporary artist who are making an attempt at the same but with lesser success.




Comentarios

Actualmente no hay comentarios

Agregar nuevo comentario

Artículos recomendados

MIKROB MIKROB
There’s 130 kilos of fat, muscles, brain & raw power on the Serbian contemporary art scene, all molded together into a 175-cm tall, 44-year-old body. It’s owner is known by a countless number of different names, including Bamboo, Mexican, Groom, Big Pain in the Ass, but most of all he’s known as MICROBE!… Hero of the losers, fighter for the rights of the dispossessed, folk artist, entertainer…
My Career in Poetry or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Institution My Career in Poetry or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Institution
An American poet was invited to the White House in order to read his controversial plagiarized poetry. All tricked out and ready to do it his way, he comes to the “scandalous” realization that nothing bothers anyone anymore, and instead of banging your head against the wall it is better to build you own walls or at least little fences.
Acts, Misdemeanors and the Thoughts of the Persian King Medimon Acts, Misdemeanors and the Thoughts of the Persian King Medimon
There is nothing that has not already been done in culture, squeezed or pulled inside out, blown to dust. Classical culture today is made by scum. Those working in the fine arts who make paintings are called artists. Otherwise in the backwaters and marshlands the rest of the artists are lost in search of new and ever surprising methods. They must be earthbound, casual, political, managerial,…
Nick Land – An Experiment in Inhumanism Nick Land – An Experiment in Inhumanism
Nick Land was a British philosopher but is no longer, though he is not dead. The almost neurotic fervor with which he scratched at the scars of reality has seduced more than a few promising academics onto the path of art that offends in its originality. The texts that he has left behind are reliably revolting and boring, and impel us to castrate their categorization as “mere” literature.