Umělec 2008/1 >> Art World Просмотр всех номеров
Журнал Umělec
Год 2008, 1
6,50 EUR
7 USD
Послать печатную версию номера:
Получить подписку

Art World

Umělec 2008/1

01.01.2008

Ivan Mečl | en cs de es

Artworld
Feinkost Gallery, Berlin, November 25, 2007 to January 10, 2008

Ad Reinhardt, Alan Phelan, Balthasar Burkhard, Ben Gavin, Charles Gute, Christian Jankowski, IRWIN, Luchezar Boyadjiev, Matthieu Laurette, Pablo Helguera, Rainer Ganahl, REP Group, SOSka Group, et al.



“This has been our best and most successful auction ever!” This statement has become a generic catchphrase for punctuating every auction of contemporary art in New York or London; each auction house boasting comparative and competitive results. But is the commonly used term “fair market value” an accurate way to describe an unregulated market? In recent years the widespread recognition of contemporary art’s potential commercial value has pervaded public consciousness and led to unprecedented investment propelling the art market. As critics have pointed out, relative value no longer applies as Giacometti sells for a bargain when compared to Damien Hirst. What this then means in terms of how and who art history will be written by is really nothing new for how it has always been written: upper echelons of society with expendable capital have been the oil in the creative industry’s machine for centuries. Today, however, the general population in cities like London, New York or Berlin is tuned into the trends, trivia and tribulations that orbit the Art World. No longer is this exclusively a specialist’s game where interpretation is necessary to decipher cultural production. But the process by which the institutionally approved object arrives—the packaging it arrives in, who delivers it and why—remains one of the unexplained socio-cultural phenomena today.







Комментарии

Статья не была прокомментирована

Добавить новый комментарий

Рекомендуемые статьи

Nick Land – An Experiment in Inhumanism Nick Land – An Experiment in Inhumanism
Nick Land was a British philosopher but is no longer, though he is not dead. The almost neurotic fervor with which he scratched at the scars of reality has seduced more than a few promising academics onto the path of art that offends in its originality. The texts that he has left behind are reliably revolting and boring, and impel us to castrate their categorization as “mere” literature.
Magda Tóthová Magda Tóthová
Borrowing heavily from fairy tales, fables and science fiction, the art of Magda Tóthová revolves around modern utopias and social models and their failures. Her works address personal and social issues, both the private and the political. The stylistic device of personification is central to the social criticism emblematic of her work and to the negotiation of concepts used to construct norms.…
Terminator vs. Avatar: Notes on Accelerationism Terminator vs. Avatar: Notes on Accelerationism
Why political intellectuals, do you incline towards the proletariat? In commiseration for what? I realize that a proletarian would hate you, you have no hatred because you are bourgeois, privileged, smooth-skinned types, but also because you dare not say that the only important thing there is to say, that one can enjoy swallowing the shit of capital, its materials, its metal bars, its polystyrene…
An unsuccessful co-production An unsuccessful co-production
If you know your way around, you might discover that every month and maybe even every week you stand the chance to receive money for your cultural project. Successful applicants have enough money, average applicants have enough to keep their mouths shut, and the unsuccessful ones are kept in check by the chance that they might get lucky in the future. One natural result has been the emergence of…