Zeitschrift Umělec 1998/6-7 >> Interview with the new General Director of the National Gallery, Dagmar Šefčíková Übersicht aller Ausgaben
Zeitschrift Umělec
Jahrgang 1998, 6-7
2,50 EUR
3 USD
Die Printausgabe schicken an:
Abo bestellen

Interview with the new General Director of the National Gallery, Dagmar Šefčíková

Zeitschrift Umělec 1998/6-7

01.06.1998

Lenka Lindaurová | q&a | en cs

What was the background of your recent appointment. Culture Minister Pavel Dostál calls it a forced administration...

I am properly appointed to the office of the General Director with a decree limiting my term by call for a tender for the position. I’m not sure what kind of terms the Minister is using in some interviews but forced administration seems to be a term for banking industry.
It sounds a bit frightening.

I haven’t heard it myself and I don’t know what the Minister means by the term. I know that by June 15, 1999, a tender will be called for the position of the General Director where some sort of criteria will be set. Most likely, I will take part in the tender myself.
I would think that the term forced administration came about in response to non-transparent financing of the National Gallery and media exposure of clashes between the Modern and Contemporary Art Collection Director and the General Director who had been accused of tunneling the institution. What is the state of the National Gallery as left by your predecessor, Mr. Zlatohlávek?

If we accept the term forced administration, it concerns purely economic and organizational issues which absolutely follow up on each other. The Gallery’s economic situation, as I’ve come to know it during the past three weeks, looks like this: unpaid invoices amounting to 14 million crowns ($493,000 US). The amount includes, of course, various types of expenses such as a debt to the Gallery’s former Chairman of the Board of Directors, Mr. Messer, for his travel expenses which is difficult to solve in terms of current Ministry regulations. There are also debts for catalogues, rent, and there are also things which are quite hard to understand such as debts for hexachromes. Such small amounts should not make this chain even longer. What I was most shocked by right at the beginning, however, was the most pressing problem which is a loan of 150 million crowns ($5,282,000 US) for completion of Veleržní palác (seat of the National Gallery’s Modern and Contemporary Art Collection). The Finance Ministry asked the National Gallery in writing to return the money but the Gallery never answered the request. The Finance Ministry is suggesting that it will strictly demand pay offs.
This is at least a three-year-old issue. Why hasn’t it been dealt with before?

When I was looking for that written request, I found out from colleague Zlatohlávek that he took the letter to the Culture Ministry because the Gallery could not afford to pay 150 million. I found out that there was no copy, there was no proof of correspondence concerning this issue. I had to look up documents from five different sources. There was no continual documentation here, as if 150 million was funny money.
The National Gallery is not able to pay the debt, though?

We will try and look for some reasonable solution. We just have to come to an agreement with both Ministries and make coordinated progress in this matter. Today, I received a copy of a letter which Finance Minister Svoboda had sent to Culture Minister Dostál. In the letter, he notified the Gallery that on July 1 he had sent an amendment to the loan contract which would put off back payments until the beginning of 1999. Before, everybody was sort of hoping that the loan would slowly transform itself into non-returnable loan which could be considered a special subsidy. This all, however, has to be based on contracts.
Do you believe that the loan will be transformed into a subsidy?

I cannot answer this today. We will have to work with the current arguments and documentation of current economic situation. I cannot foresee the Finance Ministry’s decision.
Do you think that former General Director Zlatohlávek is responsible for these financial problems?

Look, responsibility for a subsidized organization to its founder always lays on the director, the statutory representative. What authorities he further distributes, how he establishes control of relations within the organization and clear responsibilities is all up to him. A director may be a genius scientist but he may not be talented at managerial work. The situation gets out of his control and even worse things may happen. I’m convinced that there was no bad intention on his part but I don’t think he was a type of person who would devote all his talent and energy to the decision to become a director. Being a director, whether it is a small or big organization, is in a way missionary work. One has to partially or completely give up his or her own expert work they were doing before. Zlatohlávek was responsible for the National Gallery, for fulfilling its mission statement, for following the organizational rules and if this got out of his control, then he was a bad director. But he might not be a bad person.
Do you know today whether former Modern and Contemporary Art Collection Director Jaroslav Anděl’s complains concerning tunneling of Veletržní palác were justified?

From what I’ve had a chance to see in the invoice audit, this interpretation of affairs is based on lack of knowledge of regulations. This was not tunneling. There exists a term – depreciation. In Veletržní palác as a new building, the amount of depreciation was enormous. Depreciation is formally transformed into financial sources for investment. There is no regulation which says that money coming from depreciation of one building has to be used in the same place especially if another building is in a state of collapse. I cannot even imagine what colleague Anděl meant by tunneling. When a qualified audit is finished here, we can have an answer to this. The National Gallery has never had a plan for internal audits, there was not a system worked out either. Some things were played down and were not taken seriously. We have to treat the buildings and collections as a state property. We are in charge of the property and we have to be efficient. We also have to follow regulations concerning subsidies from the state budget. Just like anywhere in the world.
Your predecessor was trying to make the collections in some way autonomous and they were, indeed, very autonomous. What do you think of this issue and what do you think of proposals to make Veletržní palác completely autonomous?

Those are two questions. I’ll start from the more general part, i.e. whether my predecessor took some steps in the autonomy issue and whether he did so correctly or wrongly. He initiated a situation which today forms a proposal of the organizational structure from the fall of 1994. I think that autonomy of the collections in all their scientific matters and into a certain extent the practicalities is a very good thing. This was a necessary step because there is no institution here that went through so many reorganizations. There were, however, further autonomization steps which were completely wrong. Moreover, they were wrong in a quite peculiar way. The Gallery issued a document which states conditions for administration of the collections and nobody ever cancelled this old regulation. Yet things are completely different today. Theoretically, if there was some sort of mean auditor here, he would find out that due to autonomy, the regulation was no longer implemented. A continuous department ceased to exist in the Gallery whether it had once been called a central department or an administration log department. Anyway, within this department there existed a thirty-year-long file of guarantee contracts which was untouchable. In any moment in time, you could trace down the whereabouts of the collections’ items. After the autonomy process, you have to ask for objects for loan in each of the collections separately and follow their own regulations.
You think, then, that the form for the National Gallery collections would be their partial autonomy with a central department providing services for them?

Yes, this is functional. Similar institutions around the world also have some central services if they want to work efficiently and professionally.
Can such a chaos in the collections’ administration have a negative impact on the physical artworks?

The difference between the conditions and behavior of the individual collections, say during distribution or accounting, do not represent danger for the objects themselves. They just cause that the National Gallery has a bad reputation from the professional point of view. But ultimately – they may. It is always better if one person overviews conditions and terms of contracts and their fulfilling, a person working together with the collections and making sure that nothing gets left out.
What is the situation with the damaged Picasso painting, one of the cases talked about in connection with Zlatohlávek’s resignation? The rumor is that the National Gallery is not getting any damages from the insurance company.
No, it’s not.
Because the Gallery did not meet the insurance conditions?

No, because the Luisiana museum, where the painting was in loan, did not meet them. We are now negotiating compensations. We haven’t got any answer as yet. Zlatohlávek did not think of the possible consequences of exhibiting the piece without an air-conditioning box which was demanded on the spot. On the other hand, I think that if everything worked the way it was supposed to, he would not loan the picture.





Kommentar

Der Artikel ist bisher nicht kommentiert worden

Neuen Kommentar einfügen

Empfohlene Artikel

Nick Land, Ein Experiment im Inhumanismus Nick Land, Ein Experiment im Inhumanismus
Nick Land war ein britischer Philosoph, den es nicht mehr gibt, ohne dass er gestorben ist. Sein beinahe neurotischer Eifer für das Herummäkeln an Narben der Realität, hat manch einen hoffnungsvollen Akademiker zu einer obskuren Weise des Schaffens verleitet, die den Leser mit Originalität belästigt. Texte, die er zurückgelassen hat, empören, langweilen und treiben noch immer zuverlässig die Wissenschaftler dazu, sie als „bloße“ Literatur einzustufen und damit zu kastrieren.
Contents 2016/1 Contents 2016/1
Contents of the new issue.
Ein Interview mit Mike Hollands Ein Interview mit Mike Hollands
„Man muss die Hand von jemandem dreimal schütteln und der Person dabei fest in die Augen sehen. So schafft man es, sich den Namen von jemandem mit Sicherheit zu merken. Ich hab’ mir auf diese Art die Namen von 5.000 Leuten im Horse Hospital gemerkt”, erzählte mir Jim Hollands. Hollands ist ein experimenteller Filmemacher, Musiker und Kurator. In seiner Kindheit litt er unter harten sozialen…
Im Rausch des medialen Déjà-vu. Anmerkungen zur Bildnerischen Strategie von Oliver Pietsch Im Rausch des medialen Déjà-vu. Anmerkungen zur Bildnerischen Strategie von Oliver Pietsch
Goff & Rosenthal, Berlin, 18.11. – 30.12.2006 Was eine Droge ist und was nicht, wird gesellschaftlich immer wieder neu verhandelt, ebenso das Verhältnis zu ihr. Mit welcher Droge eine Gesellschaft umgehen kann und mit welcher nicht und wie von ihr filmisch erzählt werden kann, ob als individuelles oder kollektives Erleben oder nur als Verbrechen, demonstriert der in Berlin lebende Videokünstler…
04.02.2020 10:17
Wohin weiter?
offside - vielseitig
S.d.Ch, Einzelgängertum und Randkultur  (Die Generation der 1970 Geborenen)
S.d.Ch, Einzelgängertum und Randkultur (Die Generation der 1970 Geborenen)
Josef Jindrák
Wer ist S.d.Ch? Eine Person mit vielen Interessen, aktiv in diversen Gebieten: In der Literatur, auf der Bühne, in der Musik und mit seinen Comics und Kollagen auch in der bildenden Kunst. In erster Linie aber Dichter und Dramatiker. Sein Charakter und seine Entschlossenheit machen ihn zum Einzelgänger. Sein Werk überschneidet sich nicht mit aktuellen Trends. Immer stellt er seine persönliche…
Weiterlesen …
offside - hanfverse
Die THC-Revue – Verschmähte Vergangenheit
Die THC-Revue – Verschmähte Vergangenheit
Ivan Mečl
Wir sind der fünfte Erdteil! Pítr Dragota und Viki Shock, Genialitätsfragmente (Fragmenty geniality), Mai/Juni 1997 Viki kam eigentlich vorbei, um mir Zeichnungen und Collagen zu zeigen. Nur so zur Ergänzung ließ er mich die im Samizdat (Selbstverlag) entstandene THC-Revue von Ende der Neunzigerjahre durchblättern. Als die mich begeisterte, erschrak er und sagte, dieses Schaffen sei ein…
Weiterlesen …
prize
To hen kai pán (Jindřich Chalupecký Prize Laureate 1998 Jiří Černický)
To hen kai pán (Jindřich Chalupecký Prize Laureate 1998 Jiří Černický)
Weiterlesen …
mütter
Wer hat Angst vorm Muttersein?
Wer hat Angst vorm Muttersein?
Zuzana Štefková
Die Vermehrung von Definitionen des Begriffes „Mutter“ stellt zugleich einen Ort wachsender Unterdrückung wie auch der potenziellen Befreiung dar.1 Carol Stabile Man schrieb das Jahr 2003, im dichten Gesträuch des Waldes bei Kladno (Mittelböhmen) stand am Wegesrand eine Frau im fortgeschrittenen Stadium der Schwangerschaft. Passanten konnten ein Aufblitzen ihres sich wölbenden Bauchs erblicken,…
Weiterlesen …
Bücher und Medien, die Sie interessieren könnten Zum e-shop
"...one of the 'few truly original Czech composers of the last century..."
Mehr Informationen ...
12 EUR
13 USD
1993, 35.5 x 43 cm (2 Pages), Pen & Ink Comic
Mehr Informationen ...
672 EUR
724 USD

Studio

Divus and its services

Studio Divus designs and develops your ideas for projects, presentations or entire PR packages using all sorts of visual means and media. We offer our clients complete solutions as well as all the individual steps along the way. In our work we bring together the most up-to-date and classic technologies, enabling us to produce a wide range of products. But we do more than just prints and digital projects, ad materials, posters, catalogues, books, the production of screen and space presentations in interiors or exteriors, digital work and image publication on the internet; we also produce digital films—including the editing, sound and 3-D effects—and we use this technology for web pages and for company presentations. We specialize in ...
 

Zitat des Tages Der Herausgeber haftet nicht für psychische und physische Zustände, die nach Lesen des Zitats auftreten können.

Die Begierde hält niemals ihre Versprechen.
KONTAKTE UND INFORMATIONEN FÜR DIE BESUCHER Kontakte Redaktion

DIVUS LONDON

 

STORE
Arch 8, Resolution Way, Deptford

London SE8 4NT, United Kingdom
Open on appointment

 

OFFICE
7 West Street, Hastings
East Sussex, TN34 3AN
, United Kingdom
Open on appointment
 

Ivan Mečl
ivan@divus.org.uk, +44 (0) 7526 902 082

DIVUS
NOVA PERLA
Kyjov 37, 407 47 Krásná Lípa
Czech Republic
divus@divus.cz
+420 222 264 830, +420 602 269 888

Open daily 10am to 6pm
and on appointment.

 

DIVUS BERLIN
Potsdamer Str. 161, 10783 Berlin
Germany

berlin@divus.cz, +49 (0) 1512 9088 150
Open on appointment.

 

DIVUS WIEN
wien@divus.cz
DIVUS MEXICO CITY
mexico@divus.cz
DIVUS BARCELONA
barcelona@divus.cz
DIVUS MOSCOW & MINSK

alena@divus.cz

DIVUS NEWSPAPER IN DIE E-MAIL
Divus New book by I.M.Jirous in English at our online bookshop.