Umělec magazine 2000/3 >> Tate Modern—Responses List of all editions.
Tate Modern—Responses
Umělec magazine
Year 2000, 3
6,50 EUR
7 USD
Send the printed edition:
Order subscription

Tate Modern—Responses

Umělec magazine 2000/3

01.03.2000

Simona Mayerová-Goddard | info | en cs

The new museum of modern art, Tate Modern, has been open since mid-May. The possibility of using the overhauled power station as a museum had been discussed long before the eagerly anticipated opening. British television broadcast a series on the building’s architecture and reconstruction, and included interviews with Tate and Tate Modern directors, architects and chief curators of the collections. On D-Day, BBC 1 broadcast live the Queen’s visit to the museum, the evening party and night light show.
A number of articles have appeared in the press in the UK over the past six months crediting contemporary art with some kind of exclusive social role, which had until then been reserved for the stars of haute couture, pop music and the film industry.
The vast majority of critiques in art magazines were positive, with the occasional criticism of the installation of the entire collection. Critics appreciated the overall new approach to installing works and monographic rooms while they criticized only a few specific parts. The juxtaposition of Monet’s Water-Lilies and Richard Long’s B&W canvas England was the most chastised. Artists, too, praised the new museum as Tate Modern emphasized contemporary tendencies, the interconnection of disciplines and support for young art. The first temporary exhibition, Between Cinema and a Hard Place, is a successful example of the museum’s efforts.
Due to the positive response in media, interest among the public is big. Despite the building’s huge capacity, the viewers are only allowed to enter one at a time, even one month after the opening. Overall, professionals and the public are happy that Britain finally has an institution comparable to the Museum of Modern Art in New York and the Centre Pompidou in Paris.




01.03.2000

Comments

There are currently no comments.

Add new comment

Recommended articles

Terminator vs. Avatar: Notes on Accelerationism Terminator vs. Avatar: Notes on Accelerationism
Why political intellectuals, do you incline towards the proletariat? In commiseration for what? I realize that a proletarian would hate you, you have no hatred because you are bourgeois, privileged, smooth-skinned types, but also because you dare not say that the only important thing there is to say, that one can enjoy swallowing the shit of capital, its materials, its metal bars, its polystyrene…
Magda Tóthová Magda Tóthová
Borrowing heavily from fairy tales, fables and science fiction, the art of Magda Tóthová revolves around modern utopias and social models and their failures. Her works address personal and social issues, both the private and the political. The stylistic device of personification is central to the social criticism emblematic of her work and to the negotiation of concepts used to construct norms.…
Contents 2016/1 Contents 2016/1
Contents of the new issue.
No Future For Censorship No Future For Censorship
Author dreaming of a future without censorship we have never got rid of. It seems, that people don‘t care while it grows stronger again.