Umělec magazine 2000/3 >> Tate Modern—Responses List of all editions.
Tate Modern—Responses
Umělec magazine
Year 2000, 3
6,50 EUR
7 USD
Send the printed edition:
Order subscription

Tate Modern—Responses

Umělec magazine 2000/3

01.03.2000

Simona Mayerová-Goddard | info | en cs

The new museum of modern art, Tate Modern, has been open since mid-May. The possibility of using the overhauled power station as a museum had been discussed long before the eagerly anticipated opening. British television broadcast a series on the building’s architecture and reconstruction, and included interviews with Tate and Tate Modern directors, architects and chief curators of the collections. On D-Day, BBC 1 broadcast live the Queen’s visit to the museum, the evening party and night light show.
A number of articles have appeared in the press in the UK over the past six months crediting contemporary art with some kind of exclusive social role, which had until then been reserved for the stars of haute couture, pop music and the film industry.
The vast majority of critiques in art magazines were positive, with the occasional criticism of the installation of the entire collection. Critics appreciated the overall new approach to installing works and monographic rooms while they criticized only a few specific parts. The juxtaposition of Monet’s Water-Lilies and Richard Long’s B&W canvas England was the most chastised. Artists, too, praised the new museum as Tate Modern emphasized contemporary tendencies, the interconnection of disciplines and support for young art. The first temporary exhibition, Between Cinema and a Hard Place, is a successful example of the museum’s efforts.
Due to the positive response in media, interest among the public is big. Despite the building’s huge capacity, the viewers are only allowed to enter one at a time, even one month after the opening. Overall, professionals and the public are happy that Britain finally has an institution comparable to the Museum of Modern Art in New York and the Centre Pompidou in Paris.




01.03.2000

Comments

There are currently no comments.

Add new comment

Recommended articles

An unsuccessful co-production An unsuccessful co-production
If you know your way around, you might discover that every month and maybe even every week you stand the chance to receive money for your cultural project. Successful applicants have enough money, average applicants have enough to keep their mouths shut, and the unsuccessful ones are kept in check by the chance that they might get lucky in the future. One natural result has been the emergence of…
Terminator vs. Avatar: Notes on Accelerationism Terminator vs. Avatar: Notes on Accelerationism
Why political intellectuals, do you incline towards the proletariat? In commiseration for what? I realize that a proletarian would hate you, you have no hatred because you are bourgeois, privileged, smooth-skinned types, but also because you dare not say that the only important thing there is to say, that one can enjoy swallowing the shit of capital, its materials, its metal bars, its polystyrene…
The Top 10 Czech Artists from the 1990s The Top 10 Czech Artists from the 1990s
The editors of Umělec have decided to come up with a list of ten artists who, in our opinion, were of crucial importance for the Czech art scene in the 1990s. After long debate and the setting of criteria, we arrived at a list of names we consider significant for the local context, for the presentation of Czech art outside the country and especially for the future of art. Our criteria did not…
Le Dernier Cri and the black penis of Marseille Le Dernier Cri and the black penis of Marseille
We’re constantly hearing that someone would like to do some joint project, organize something together, some event, but… damn, how to put it... we really like what you’re doing but it might piss someone off back home. Sure, it’s true that every now and then someone gets kicked out of this institution or that institute for organizing something with Divus, but weren’t they actually terribly self…