Umělec 2008/1 >> Martin Sedlák Просмотр всех номеров
Martin Sedlák
Журнал Umělec
Год 2008, 1
6,50 EUR
7 USD
Послать печатную версию номера:
Получить подписку

Martin Sedlák

Umělec 2008/1

01.01.2008

Jan Zálešák | profile | en cs de es

Moravian Gallery, Brno, Pražák Palace Atrium, October 2007 – January 2008

I first encountered the objects of Slovak artist Martin Sedlák in the baroque granary at Klenova, where they were exhibited together with the finalists of the Startpoint 2005 prize. In a space in which I did not expect to encounter art, I was unexpectedly impressed by the light emanating from what appeared to be a boarded up window. Upon further scrutiny of the source of the light, I learned that the space “beyond” the wall was only an illusion created with light. Without using symbolism or attributing any literary meaning to his work, Sedlák’s Klenova installations awakened in the viewer (or at least in me) not only curiosity, but also something akin to a feeling of transcendence. Nevertheless, even reading his art as witty commentary requires exposure and openness to the artwork.
In the Moravian Gallery the artist’s work isn’t as surprising. Four objects are layed out around a crepuscular, but not completely dark space. Two of them, Zorro 2 (2007) and Zorro 3 (2007), elaborate a motif present in Sedlák’s light installations from the beginning: doors that are both gates and gateways.
Like the installation at Klenova, Sedlák uses technologically advanced material (electroluminescent foil) in combination with concepts from the outdoors and the agricultural. His motifs are amplified by evocations of the famous hero, Zorro. Zorro is like a medieval knight representing connections to both the high and the low, the gentile and the tough. For the generation that grew up with Hollywood blockbusters and the bravado of Antonio Banderas’ gesticulating sweeps, the combination of Zorro’s signature “Z” and the rustic stable provokes a light smile.
The second set of objects has a similarly subversive character. (The two, lit puddles in the corner of the gallery, Accident (2006), unfortunately were not lit when I visited the exhibition, so I could only judge from the photo documentation on the Moravian Gallery web page). There is an illusion of naturalness that establishes a trompe l’oleil effect and leads to a contextual reading bolstered by the work’s title: the two radiant objects on the floor suddenly look like explicitly comical pictures of leaking nuclear material. In U Nimbu (2007), the artist uses a different technique. An illuminated belt is displayed, not mounted directly on the wall, but on an interior shadow eclipsing the supporting structure. Light glows from the “inside” and fills in the structure’s restricted space. The work’s title is once again fundamental to its reading. Nimbus is not merely an attribute; it is the core of the work. Moreover, it’s radiance gives meaning to the space inside the structure while leaving the center quite dark. Nimbus, with its symbolically empty frame (which in reality is just the gallery wall), can be appreciated as a typical contribution to the traditional vanitas theme.
Understanding and interpreting Sedlák’s work prompts “reflexive” ideas such as the experience of light penetrating into dark space. As far as its magic and captivating charm, Sedlák’s use of light evokes feelings similar to those of “cleaner” light installations by the likes of Dan Flavin and Olafur Eliasson or, more locally, installations by Stanislav Zippe or Pavel Korbičky. Martin Sedlák’s bold handiwork nevertheless presents the character of his working process: folios are fixed to the walls with screws wherever it is necessary, and sometimes they are covered with cardboard. It could be said that the aforementioned “magic” of Sedlák’s installations is something like a side-effect on which he relies to contribute to the subtle irony of the whole installation.







Комментарии

Статья не была прокомментирована

Добавить новый комментарий

Рекомендуемые статьи

Terminator vs. Avatar: Notes on Accelerationism Terminator vs. Avatar: Notes on Accelerationism
Why political intellectuals, do you incline towards the proletariat? In commiseration for what? I realize that a proletarian would hate you, you have no hatred because you are bourgeois, privileged, smooth-skinned types, but also because you dare not say that the only important thing there is to say, that one can enjoy swallowing the shit of capital, its materials, its metal bars, its polystyrene…
Tunelling Culture II Tunelling Culture II
My Career in Poetry or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Institution My Career in Poetry or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Institution
An American poet was invited to the White House in order to read his controversial plagiarized poetry. All tricked out and ready to do it his way, he comes to the “scandalous” realization that nothing bothers anyone anymore, and instead of banging your head against the wall it is better to build you own walls or at least little fences.
Wicked / Interview with Jim Hollands Wicked / Interview with Jim Hollands
“A person must shake someone’s hand three times while gazing intently into their eyes. That’s the key to memorizing their name with certainty. It is in this way that I’ve remembered the names of 5,000 people who have been to the Horse Hospital,” Jim Hollands told me. Hollands is an experimental filmmaker, musician and curator. In his childhood, he suffered through tough social situations and…